With newspapers going out of business and print journalism perhaps becoming a thing of the past, on-line "citizen journalists" will do an adequate job of replacing professional print reporters. What do you think?
« Newspapers are Failing | Main
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6d0853ef01156e349296970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Citizen Journalism:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
I do not believe that citizen journalist will do an adequate job as professional reporters for several reasons. For one thing, Barbra Walters didn't become a reporter over night and If the US thinks we have objectivity and media bias problems now, just wait until we use the general public as our news source.
Posted by: Whitney Everhart | March 22, 2009 at 11:54 AM
I agree with Whitney. If citizens become responsible for informing all of us, it will be nothing but even greater "partisan hackery" to use John Stewart's terminology. People will try to advance their own agendas and causes and objectivity will take a backseat to the facts. Of course we all have the RIGHT to be "citizen journalists" if we so choose, but that does not mean professionals should be eliminated.
Posted by: Kaitlyn blakey | March 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM
I also agree with Whitney. We will lose all focus, objectivity, and general content if we rely solely on citizen journalists for new sources. With no one is control, we would soon be reading and viewing things that are either completely irrevelant or inappropriate. Though we have the right to become journalists and we have the right to record events it does not mean that we have the ability to correctly inform the public of such events.
Posted by: Elisabeth Gonzales | March 24, 2009 at 12:15 PM
I agree with all the previously mentioned comments. Citizen journalists may neglect the main focus on an issue or a recent event. Like Elisabeth said we do have the ability to become journalists there is a need for certain experiences in journalism.
Posted by: Alyssa Pariselli | March 29, 2009 at 12:55 PM
As everyone else does, I agree with Whitney. There's a difference between news and gossip. Journalists know how to present current events objectively, with unbiased accounts. Anyone can take a blurry picture with a cell phone and fabricate a story about it.
Posted by: Aiken Hamilton | March 29, 2009 at 08:55 PM
While I agree with all the others, i also think that every good reporter started out as a citizen journalist. They should not be our main source of news, but if we continue to relay on older reporters, one day we wont have any.
Posted by: Katie Morgan | April 12, 2009 at 04:52 PM